New York Senate Dems

Posts Tagged: SD-53

Pam Mackesey on Women in Politics, Ninety Years After Women's Suffrage

By Mike Connery on 08/27/2010 @ 02:24 PM

Tags: Pam Mackesey, SD-53, Women

| Comments ()

Daily Campaign Roundup: Kaplowitz Fights For Property Tax Cap

By Mike Connery on 08/09/2010 @ 04:45 PM

Tags: Mike Kaplowitz, SD-40, Joanne Yepsen, SD-43, George Winner, Pam Mackesey, SD-53

TODAY'S CAMPAIGN ROUND-UP.... Today's installment of campaign-related news. Democratic Candidate Mike Kaplowitz fights for property tax cap. Democratic Candidate Joanne Yepsen leading the way to save New York's racing industry. Republican Senator puts personal profit ahead of public health.

  • Democratic Candidate Mike Kaplowitz fights for property tax capMike Kaplowitz denounced The State Assembly for failing to pass the property tax cap that the Democratic Majority in the State Senate passed last week. “It is disappointing that the Assembly left town for the summer without also passing the property tax cap. This is Albany dysfunction at its worst. There is no excuse for the Assembly’s failure to enact the cap into law.” Kaplowitz brought attention to the fact that New Yorkers pay the highest property taxes in the country and that local property taxes in New York grew by 73% from 1998 to 2008 -- more than twice the rate of inflation. “Unless the Assembly enacts a property tax cap immediately, more New Yorkers will lose their homes, more families will be forced to leave our state, and more jobs will be lost,” Kaplowitz said.
  • Democratic Candidate Joanne Yepsen on Aqueduct Deal: Seal It Now - Joanne Yepsen is urging the state to act quickly on New York State Lottery Division’s recommendation to award the Aqueduct Race Track video lottery terminal contract to Genting Inc. “New York state is losing $1 million a day in revenue until the VLTs are up and running at Aqueduct, forcing taxpayers to pick up the difference in funding state programs. Tragically, this nine-year delay has cost $2.5 billion in revenue to New York state, all at a time when our deficit and unemployment rate are of great concern,” Yepsen said.

    Last Friday, Yepsen met with Sen. Eric Adams, chair of the Senate Racing Committee, to talk about the Aqueduct Race Track bidding, argue for the necessity of capital investment in the Saratoga Race Course, and highlight the local jobs and economic activity tied to such a project. Yepsen has been leading on this issue for quite some time and has continually stressed the importance of this revenue stream, “not just to Saratoga but to our entire state."
  • Republican Senator George Winner deemed “poster boy for Albany ethics mess” – Republican George Winner failed to disclose “a glaring, previously hidden conflict of interest on an issue of grave concern to all water-drinking New Yorkers.” The issue is hand is permitting hydrofracking in New York -- something Winner is a vocal proponent of. It was revealed that Winner’s his law firm has done work for some of the very companies who are seeking to make millions off the process and are lobbying the Senate to be able to drill upstate. In a true act of political cowardice, Winner is refusing to say who exactly his clients are -- or how much they are paying him. This led The New York Daily News to call this a “slam-dunk example of why the state Legislature needs ethical scrubbing.” Democrat Pam Mackesey is running to replace Winner, who is retiring, in the 53rd Senatorial District. Mackesey supports a moratorium on hydrofracking until all New Yorkers can be assured that it will not negatively impact their health in any way.

| Comments ()

Republican Senator Puts Profits Ahead of Public Health

By Mike Connery on 08/09/2010 @ 03:36 PM

Tags: George Winner, Pam Mackesey, SD-53

Republican corruption and ethical violations in the State Senate are nothing new. So what did it take for Republican incumbent Senator George Winner to be coined the “poster boy for Albany ethics mess” by The Daily News?

New Yorkers know that Winner is one of the most vocal supporters of permitting hydrofracking - a controversial and dangerous method of extracting natural gas from a miles-deep rock formation known as the Marcellus Shale. What New Yorkers didn’t know was that Winner’s law firm has done work for some of the very companies who are seeking to make millions off the process and who are lobbying the Senate to be able to drill upstate.

For a slam-dunk example of why the state Legislature needs ethical scrubbing, look no further than state Sen. George Winner.
The Daily News' Ken Lovett reveals that Winner has a glaring, previously hidden conflict of interest on an issue of grave concern to all water-drinking New Yorkers.
A Republican from upstate Elmira, Winner has been one of the Legislature's most outspoken proponents of opening New York to hydrofracking - a controversial and dangerous method of extracting natural gas from a miles-deep rock formation known as the Marcellus Shale.
What Winner managed to keep secret until now is that his law firm has done work for some of the very companies hankering to drill upstate.

Winner says that he is for full disclosure, but he failed to mention his stake in the outcome of the hydrofracking debate when it came up in the Senate last week. And in a true act of political cowardice, Winner is refusing to say who exactly his clients are -- or how much they are paying him. The Daily News put it mildly when they said this kind of corruption is simply “unacceptable, given the high stakes for New York's water quality. Not when one bad well sunk too close to New York City's reservoirs could ruin the drinking supply for millions.”

Fortunately, Winner is retiring at the end of his term. Republicans are locked in a primary to determine who will run for his open seat, but the Democratic candidate is already chosen, and she's ready to protect our environment and our drinking water. Pam Mackesey is running a strong campaign in the 53rd Senatorial District. Mackesey supports a moratorium on hydrofracking until all New Yorkers can be assured that it will not negatively impact their health in any way.

| Comments ()

Daily Campaign Roundup: Eleanor's Legacy Endorses Three More Democratic Candidates

By Mike Connery on 08/06/2010 @ 03:28 PM

Tags: Susan Savage, SD-44, Kathleen Joy, SD-50, Carol Gordon, SD-8, Didi Barrett, Sd-41, Cynthia Appleton, SD-59, Regina Calcaterra, SD-1, Pam Mackesey, SD-53, Mary Wilmot, SD-55, Robin Wilt, SD-56, Joanne Yepsen, SD-43, Darrel Aubertine, SD-48

TODAY'S CAMPAIGN ROUND-UP.... Today's installment of campaign-related news. Eleanor's Legacy endorses three more Democratic candidates. Sen. Darrel Aubertine receives major union endorsement. U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gilliibrand to attend brunch for Democratic candidate Joanne Yepsen. Democratic candidate Robin Wilt to be interviewed by The Albany Project.

  • Eleanor's Legacy endorses three more Democratic candidates - The Eleanor Roosevelt Legacy Committee, an organization focused on bringing a new generation of Democratic women candidates, informed voters, and political activists throughout New York, endorsed Susan Savage, Kathleen Joy, and Carol Gordon yesterday - bringing the total of endorsed Democratic candidates to 10. Eleanor's Legacy previously endorsed Didi Barrett, Cynthia Appleton, Regina Calcaterra, Pam Mackesey, Mary Wilmot, Robin Wilt, and Joanne Yepsen. They called these women leaders in their community that "will be powerful voices in Albany" and "who represent the new face of leadership in New York."
  • Sen. Darrel Aubertine receives major union endorsement - The Central Trades and Labor Council endorsed Sen. Aubertine yesterday in his bid for reelection. The council represents more than 24,000 AFL-CIO members in Jefferson, Lewis and St. Lawrence counties. "This is a huge endorsement," Mr. Aubertine said. "Clearly, having the support of the labor community is a huge asset. I'm gratified that it went the way it did." Sen. Aubertine's principled vote earlier this year against the furlough of workers in a budget extender was important, and was made in consultation with labor leaders, he said. "It wasn't cavalier," he said. "That decision wasn't made in the dark of night."
  • U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand to attend fundraising brunch for Democratic Candidate Joanne Yepsen - Joanne Yepsen is getting a little help from a big name in her effort to unseat Republican incumbent Roy McDonald. U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand will be attending a fundraising brunch Aug. 14 to benefit Yepsen’s campaign. In a show of the tremendous local support of her campaign, she outraised McDonald by more than $30,000 -- and had $76,000 cash on hand -- in her last filing.
  • What would you ask Democratic Candidate Robin Wilt? - In their third installment of interviews of Democratic State Senate challengers, The Albany Project will be interviewing Robin Wilt, who is challenging Republican incumbent Joe Robach in the 56th Senatorial District. You can send your questions in for Robin here.

| Comments ()

Year of the Woman Hits NY

By Mike Connery on 07/16/2010 @ 04:40 PM

Tags: Regina Calcaterra, SD-1, Carol Gordon, SD-8, Didi Barrett, SD-41, Joanne Yepsen, SD-43, Susan Savage, SD-44, Kathleen Joy, SD-50, Pam Mackesey, SD-53, Mary Wilmot, SD-55, Robin Wilt, SD-56, Cindy Appleton, SD-59

Writing at POLITICO, Maggie Haberman profiles Democratic women challenging incumbent Republicans in the State Senate, and notes that The Year of the Woman Hits New York :

The Year of the Woman candidate has arrived in New York for the 2010 cycle, with an unprecedented slate of 10 female hopefuls vying for legislative office on the Democratic side in a state known as politically progressive but lagging at the state level.
With help from EMILY's List over the last few years, the state Senate Democrats now have 10 women competing in districts ranging from swing-county Suffolk in Long Island to more rural areas of upstate New York.
"I think it is reflective of a larger pattern throughout the country," said state Sen. Liz Krueger (D-Manhattan), who is the recruitment chair for the political arm of the Senate Democrats. "Women in both parties throughout the country are looking at who's in office and saying, 'Oh hell, I can do better than that!'"

Women make up 52% of the population in New York State. So it's shameful that only 16% (just 10 out of 62) of our state senators are women. The slate of women candidates run by the New York Senate Dems could double the number of women serving in the state senate, and clear the way for progress on a host of issues including ethics reform and marriage equality. But what these women bring to the table goes far beyond reform and social issues that have defined past campaigns by women.

The slate of candidates looking to unseat 1/3 of the republican conference demonstrate a strong a track record of economic achievement around which they are focusing their campaigns. These women created jobs at the county level; they increased investment in green jobs; they even took on Wall Street giants – and won. They’re fighting not only to end the dysfunction in Albany, but to put our state back on sound economic footing

"I think what sets these women apart is they're accomplished in their own rights and own careers and now want to turn their attentions [to government]," said state Sen. Jeff Klein, adding that those running are not being pigeonholed into campaigning on what are typically considered "women's issues," a fate that has befallen some other female Empire State candidates.
This election cycle, the stakes have never been higher. Democrats hold a razor-thin, one vote majority in the State Senate. The outcome of these races will determine how effective we are at moving a Democratic Agenda in 2011 and putting our state back on track.

As Susan Savage, the Democratic challenger to 34-year incumbent Hugh Farley, says – “We're not going to change Albany until we change the people that we send to Albany.” With your help, these women will unseat Republican obstructionists who created Albany’s corrupt culture, help revive our economy, and give New Yorkers the government they deserve.

Below is a quick look at the New York Senate Dems class of women challengers. Click the links for more information, or to join and contribute to their campaigns.

  • Susan Savage - Chair of the Schenectady County Legislature, she created thousands of jobs and brought millions in investments into the county. She is challenging 34-year incumbent Hugh Farley in the 44th Senate District.
  • Joanne Yepsen - As Saratoga County Supervisor, Joanne Yepsen held down local taxes and helped local businesses. She is now challenging Joe Bruno’s hand-picked-successor, Roy McDonald, in the 43rd Senate District.
  • Didi Barrett - A leader in the non profit world for decades, and a strong advocate for women in New York, Didi Barrett is challenging 20-year incumbent Steve Saland in the 41st Senate District, the seat once held by FDR.
  • Mary Wilmot - As Regional Director for the Governor and the New York State Senate, Wilmot has extensive knowledge of the challenges Upstate New York faces, and she is determined to revitalize New York’s economy through investments in clean energy. Wilmot is challenging 14-year incumbent James Alesi in the 55th Senate District.
  • Robin Wilt - As community activist, real estate agent, and small business owner, Wilt has seen first-hand the economic challenges facing Monroe County. She is the co-founder of the Genesee Valley chapter of Progressive Democrats of America, and is challenging seven-year incumbent Joe Robach.
  • Regina Calcaterra - A corporate fraud lawyer who took on Wall Street and won, Regina Calcaterra is now taking the fight to thirty-four-year incumbent Ken LaValle in Suffolk County’s 1st Senate District.
  • Kathleen Joy - Syracuse Common Counselor-At-Large and Majority Leader Kathleen Joy has a record promoting green infrastructure. She’s now challenging 18-year incumbent, and self-described GOP “pit bull” John DeFrancisco in the 50th Senate District.
  • Cynthia Appleton - A three-term Village Trustee in Warsaw, NY, Appleton has first-hand experience with the impact of Albany’s dysfunction at the local level, and is ready to clean up the capital. She is running for the open seat vacated by retiring Republican Senator Dale Volker.
  • Pam Mackesey - As a union organizer, she witnessed first-hand the struggles that everyday Schuyler, Steuben, and Chemung county residents face, Pam Mackesey is determined to defeat six-year incumbent George Winner in the 53rd Senate District.
  • Carol Gordon - As a Mental Health Clinic Manager and Patient Advocate at the Department of Veterans Affairs, Carol Gordon served our veterans for 25 years. Now she is challenging twelve-year incumbent Charles Fuschillo in the 8th Senate District.

| Comments ()

Daily Campaign Roundup: DSCC Posts Record Fundraising Numbers

By Mike Connery on 07/15/2010 @ 03:46 PM

Tags: Regina Calcaterra, SD-1, Carol Gordon, SD-8, Didi Barrett, SD-41, Joanne Yepsen, SD-43, Susan Savage, SD-44, Kathleen Joy, SD-50, Pam Mackesey, SD-53, Mary Wilmot, SD-55, Robin Wilt, SD-56, Cynthia Appleton, SD-59, David Mejias, SD-6

TODAY'S CAMPAIGN ROUND-UP.... Today's installment of campaign-related news. DSCC announces record fundraising haul. POLITICO profiles the 10 Democratic candidates, declares 2010 "Year of the Woman.' New Siena poll spells more trouble for Senate GOP. Democratic Candidate David Mejias running strong on Long Island. Democratic Candidate Susan Savage outraises opponent by almost 2-1 margin since declaring candidacy. Westchester business group withdraws endorsements for local Republicans.

  • Senate Democrats announce record fundraising numbers - We at the DSCC filed stellar fundraising numbers today - which The New York Times CityBlog described by saying "Senate Democrats Flush With Campaign Money". Capital Confidential said "we are rolling in it." We raised a historic $3.5 million during the first six months of the year, while spending less than $2 million. We now have $3.5 million in cash on hand - more than twice the amount of money we had at this point two years ago, when we went on to pick up two seats in the November elections and take control of the Senate for the first time in decades. “We are raising more money than ever before, competing in more regions of the state than ever before, and engaging with campaigns earlier than ever before. That’s why, in November, Democrats will win more seats than ever before,” said Sen. Jeff Klein, DSCC chair. “Today’s filing clearly shows that New Yorkers recognize that we have begun the work of putting government back in the hands of the people.”
  • 'Year of the Woman' Hits New York - Maggie Haberman of POLITICO coined 2010 the 'Year of the Woman' in an extensive piece earlier today that hailed our "unprecedented slate of 10 female hopefuls... in districts ranging from swing-county Suffolk in Long Island to more rural areas of upstate New York." She quotes Democratic Candidate Susan Savage, who is running against 34-year incumbent Hugh Farley as saying: "I think we're not going to change Albany until we change the people that we send to Albany. "Many of these incumbents have been there a very long time ... I really do understand that there's a lot that needs to be accomplished and it's very hard to do that with the group of people that are in the Senate now." Haberman also pointed out that the Senate GOP are fielding just two women, one of whom is in a contentious primary battle.
  • Siena Poll spells trouble for the Senate GOP - Siena released its most recent election poll earlier this morning, showing that less than one in four voters want a Republican Senate, and 69% of voters preferring the existing or an enlarged Democratic majority. In upstate New York - where Republicans sit in most of the Senate seats - just 26% of those polled wanted Republican control of the Senate, as opposed to the 68% who favored Democratic control. Voters upstate are far more pessimistic about the direction of the state - with 86% saying we are on the wrong track - and more likely to vote their incumbent Senator out of office. This is the just the latest in a series of polls that have consistently indicated trouble for Republicans and their electoral prospects this November.
  • Democratic Candidate Dave Mejias running strong against Albany dysfunction - Former Nassau County Legislator Dave Mejias , who is running agsinst 21-year Republican incumbent Kemp Hannon, announced today he has raised $116,925 and has $112,921 cash on hand. Mejias also released a campaign kick-off video, in which he denounced the dysfunction in Albany. “I am grateful to all those who are supporting my campaign to clean up the most dysfunctional state government in America,” Mejias said in a press release. “I’m especially proud of those grassroots supporters who have given what they could afford because they believe I am the best candidate to fix our broken government.”
  • Democratic Candidate Susan Savage's fundraising efforts are solid - Susan Savage, running against 34-year Republican incumbent Hugh Farley, reported today that she raised more than $75,000 for her campaign -- almost twice what Farley reported raising over the same time period. Savage said that if we want to change Albany, we have to change who we send to Albany. This filing is a clear sign that the people of New York agree," said Doug Forand, one of Savage's campaign advisers.
  • Westchester business group retracts Republican endorsements in state senate races - A Westchester County business group backed off supporting three Republican candidates for state senate after some members expressed alarm over the sudden foray into partisan politics. The Business Council of Westchester offered an apology to its members and retracted a June 28 letter that touted meetings with Senate Minority Leader Dean Skelos, provided de facto endorsements in three races and called on members to "join the $99 club" by anonymously donating money to these campaigns. Council President and CEO Marsha Gordon, in an e-mail to members, apologized "for deviating from our tradition of being nonpartisan" and promised to return any checks.

| Comments ()

The Dominoes Continue to Fall - Republicans Contend with Primaries and Retirements

By Mike Connery on 06/06/2010 @ 01:14 PM

Tags: Dave Valesky, Vincent Leibell, Dale Volker, Thomas Morahan, George Winner, SD-40, SD-38, SD-49, SD-59, SD-53

Another day and another domino falls in a chain reaction of events that looks to dash GOP hopes of retaking the State Senate in November. Three stories this weekend continue the trend we've been monitoring for weeks.

First up, Capital News reports that a contentious Republican primary between between concert pianist Andrew Russo and East Syracuse Mayor Danny Liedka is setting up the GOP for a repeat (defeat) performance in the district currently represented by Democrat David Valesky:

Six years later, Republicans appear to have a shot at retaking the seat from Valesky, which would considerably bolster their odds of winning back the upper chamber. But a potentially divisive Republican primary between East Syracuse Mayor Danny Liedka and Andrew Russo, a concert pianist, threatens to again thrash GOP hopes.

In addition, Russo has already gotten the Conservative Party’s endorsement to run on its line in November, which would present problems for Liedka and the GOP if he emerges as their nominee. Russo said that he would run an active general election campaign on the Conservative line regardless, unlike Dadey, who Russo said did not actively campaign on the Independence and Conservative lines in 2004.

The primary was sparked, in part, because local Republican county chairs have unable to pick a candidate in the race, announcing in mid-March that they were deadlocked. (Russo won the backing of Onondoga County, which has the highest Republican registration in the district, while Russo took Madison County, which has the second highest registration.)

This local primary is microcosm of a larger trend we've seen among the GOP across the state. New York Republicans are in chaos, unable to field strong challengers from within the party ranks, short on cash and facing primary challengers from the right and left. Indeed, the SRCC appears to be supporting Russo over one of their own purely because of his cash-on-hand advantage over Leidka:

But fearing the consequences of a heated primary in a district they have serious hopes of winning, the Senate Republican Campaign Committee has made no such promises, announcing in mid-May the unusual decision to back Russo in the intra-party struggle. Leadership of the SRCC says that it will be willing to put staffers into the district and recruit elected officials to campaign on Russo’s behalf.

Fundraising was a major factor in the SRCC’s decision: Russo had $96,000 cash on hand as of the January campaign finance filing, while Liedka acknowledges he has raised far less, though he has not made any official financial disclosure.

Meanwhile, both the Ithaca Journal and Democrat and Chronicle published stories examining the difficulties Republicans face due to the large number of retirements. Every week, it seems, brings news of another GOP senate retirement, each of which requires an expenditure of resources to defend previously safe seats and draws the GOP's attention away from top tier races.

Republicans are eagerly hoping they can win back the majority in the state Senate this year, but they unexpectedly face having to defend four seats in which veteran GOP lawmakers are leaving office at year's end.

The four departures complicates Senate Republicans' goal of flipping the tenuous 32-30 seat Democratic majority and regaining control of a chamber the GOP held for more than 40 years before the 2008 elections.

One domino at a time, Republican hopes of recapturing the chamber are fading. While GOP candidates are dropping like flies (or in-fighting like the Lord of the Flies), Democrats are fielding strong challengers in more districts than ever before.

New Yorkers still remember well what 44 years of Republican control of the senate was like. That's why anti-incumbent sentiment is directed strongly at upstate Republicans - holdovers from the reign of Joe Bruno - and why 3/4 of New Yorkers reject Republican control of the Senate.

And that's why 2010 is shaping up to be a good year for Democrats.

| Comments ()

George Winner Joins the Parade of Republican Retirements

By Mike Connery on 06/02/2010 @ 05:07 PM

Tags: George Winner, Pam Mackesey, SD-53

Politics On the Hudson reports that Republican incumbent George Winner will not seek reelection in the fall, bringing the total number of Republican open seats to four:

Sen. George Winner, R-Elmira, made a surprise announcement today that he will not run for re-election this fall, making him the fourth veteran Republican senator this year to abandon his re-election plans.

Sens. Thomas Morahan of Rockland County, Vincent Leibell of Putnam County and Dale Volker of Erie County are leaving the Senate at year’s end, putting pressure on Republicans to hold seats they have long viewed as safe GOP districts.

This is yet another blow to Republicans in what should have been a banner year for their candidates across the board. To recap:

  • Vincent Leibell, Dale Volker and Thomas Morahan - all Republican incumbents - have retired or are seeking higher office this year, leaving a string of weak challengers and contentious primaries in their wake.
  • A study of voter enrollment data conducted by NYPIRG in April revealed that Democrats saw enrollment gains in 51 of 62 Senate Districts, and that Democrats held an outright registration advantage in 45 districts.
  • A poll by Quinnipiac in May showed results similar to those revealed by Siena today. Quinnipiac found anti-incumbent sentiment at its highest point in the poll's history, with Republican base voters showing the highest levels of dissatisfaction.
  • Former Republican Majority Leader Joe Bruno was convicted on two felony corruption counts.
  • And the shallowness of the Republican political bench was revealed very publicly in a New York Times story in which potential GOP Senate candidates revealed that they declined to run due to a lack of confidence in the Republican leadership.

The New York Republican Party continues to disintegrate in front of our eyes.

| Comments ()

Republicans Vote to Shut New Yorkers Out of Their Parks During Memorial Day Weekend

By Mike Connery on 05/28/2010 @ 06:21 PM

Tags: Parks, Republicans, SD-1, SD-11, SD-39, SD-40, SD-41, SD-43, SD-44, SD-53, SD-55

As Senate Democrats voted to restore funding to our parks today, Republicans proved themselves once more to be the "Party of No," voting unanimously to reject the funding and putting the profits of polluters ahead of New Yorkers who deserve access to their parks.

What's more, Republicans voted against the economic well being of our state and its citizens. The parks system is an economic engine for New York, generating upwards of $1.9 billion in revenue and over 20,000 jobs across the state. When the parks close, those jobs and revenue go away, leaving areas more economically depressed. Here's a full accounting as to how park closures would affect different areas of the state:

Allegany Region – 1.9 million visitors, 860 jobs created and $62 million in related sales and output generated by Allegany, Lake Erie, Long Point and Midway state parks

Saratoga- Capital Region – 3.3 million visitors, 2,929 jobs created and $249 million in related sales and output generated at Saratoga Spa, Thacher, Grafton Lakes and Moreau Lake state parks to name just a few.

Central Region – 2.3 million visitors, 1,620 jobs created and $134 million in related sales and output generated by Glimmerglass, Green Lakes, Verona Beach, and Chenango Valley state parks to name just a few.

Finger Lakes Region – 3 million visitors, 1,776 jobs created and $141 million in related sales and output generated by Buttermilk Falls, Watkins Glen, Seneca Lake and Keuka Lake state parks to name just a few.

Genesee Region – 1.2 million visitors, 675 jobs created and $58 million in related sales and output generated by Letchworth, Darien Lakes, Silver Lake and Hamlin Beach state parks to name just a few.

Long Island Region – 19.9 million visitors, 3,992 jobs created and $410 million in related sales and output generated by Jones Beach, Robert Moses, Montauk Point and Caleb Smith state parks to name just a few.

New York City – 4.5 million visitors, 716 jobs created and $61 million in related sales and output generated by Roberto Clemente, Riverbank and Gantry Plaza state parks to name just a few.

Niagara Frontier Region - 10.3 million visitors, 4,701 jobs created and $569 million related sales and output generated by Niagara Falls, Evangola, Woodlawn Beach and Four Mile Creek state parks to name just a few.

Palisades Region – 4.4 million visitors, 1,052 jobs created and $94 million in related sales and output generated by Harriman, Minnewaska, Bear Mountain, and Rockland Lake state park.

Taconic Region – 3.1 million visitors, 957 jobs created and $102 million in related sales and output generated by Fahnestock, Hudson Highlands, Taconic and James Baird state parks to name just a few.

Thousand Islands Region – 1.7 million visitors, 882 jobs created and $63 million in related sales and output generated by Cumberland Bay, St. Lawrence, Wellesley Island and Westcott Beach state parks to name just a few.

There was one constituency that Republicans voted for today - polluters. GOP opposition to the measure was predicated upon higher fees imposed on New York’s producers of hazardous waste -- fees that are dedicated to cleaning up the environment.

Republicans have made their priorities clear. They're on the side of corporate polluters over the people of New York, the health of our state's economy, and the open spaces that make our state great. As New Yorkers head to their local parks this weekend to honor our veterans and picnic with their family, I think they would agree that the values displayed by Republicans today are not those of New York.

| Comments ()

Senate Class of 2010 Getting Positive Reaction

By Mike Connery on 05/27/2010 @ 01:01 PM

Tags: Reform Albany, Democrats, SD-1, SD-9, SD-11, SD-40, SD-41, SD-43, SD-44, SD-50, SD-53, SD-55, SD-56

After their introduction to the New York Democratic political scene yesterday at the state convention, the members Senate Democrats Class of 2010 are receiving positive attention in the progressive blogosphere and from the state political press. Here's a sampling of the coverage thus far:

If you haven't met the Class of 2010 yourself, be sure to check out the video and use our new battleground map to connect with their campaigns.

| Comments ()

Change Albany Now: Senate Class of 2010

By Mike Connery on 05/26/2010 @ 05:01 PM

Tags: Reform Albany, Democrats, SD-1, SD-9, SD-11, SD-40, SD-41, SD-43, SD-44, SD-50, SD-53, SD-55, SD-56, Tony Avella, Didi Barrett, Regina Calcaterra, Mike Gianaris, Kathleen Joy, Mike Kaplowitz, George Sava, Susan Savage, Mary Wilmot, Robin Wilt, Joanne Yepsen

Earlier today at the State Party Convention, Senator Sampson introduced the Democratic Party, and all of New York, to the Senate Class of 2010. You can read his full remarks here (video coming soon).

As Senator Sampson noted in his address, these are the women and men in whom we are investing our hopes for the future. They are challenging Republican incumbents across New York State - from Monroe County all the way out to the tip of Long Island. They are running to Change Albany Now. But they need your help.

They need your help to get our candidates on the ballot. They need your help to staff the phone banks and stuff the mailers. They need your help to knock on doors and rally Democrats around this state.

And with your help, they'll win in November and bring real change to Albany.

Meet the Democratic Senate Class of 2010, and listen to their vision for a reformed New York. Then go out into your districts, recruit your friends and family, and help make that vision a reality.

| Comments ()

The Truth About Budget Extenders

By Mike Connery on 04/27/2010 @ 12:18 PM

Tags: Democrats, Republicans, Budget, John DeFrancisco, SD-50, John Flanagan, SD-2, Martin Golden, SD-22, Kemp Hannon, SD-6, Owen Johnson, SD-4, William Larkin, SD-39, Tom Libous, SD-52, Carl Marcellino, SD-5, George Maziarz, SD-62, Michael Nozzolio, SD-54, Michael Ranzenhofer, SD-61, James Seward, SD-51, Dean Skelos, SD-9, Dale Volker, SD-59, Joe Griffo, SD-47, George Winner, SD-53, Catharine Young, SD-57

Yesterday the Democratic Majority Conference passed another round of budget extenders. The extenders are receiving the lion's share of media attention this morning, so it's worth taking some time to know what exactly is included in the extender, and why Republicans who vote against the extenders are not only hypocritical, but also working against the interests of the public, who rely on the jobs and services the extenders provide.

First, a look at what, exactly, the extender's fund:

  • $2.57 billion mandated payments to schools for General Aid Payments not associated with the Executive’s delays of school aid payments.
  • $2.5 billion for local providers of the Medical Assistance Program including:
    • $1.45 billion for payments to Medicaid providers including:
    • $900 million for medical services provided by State facilities operated by OMH, OMRDD and OASAS.
    • $311 million for nursing home services.
    • $261 million for managed care services.
    • $234 million for long term care services.
    • $172 million for hospital inpatient services.
    • $137 million for pharmacy services
    • $67 million for non-institutional and other spending.
    • $30 million for outpatient and emergency room services
    • $29 million for clinical services
    • $12 million for transportation services
    • $7 million for dental services
  • $105.4 million for indigent care funding to providers.
  • $38 million in Health Care Reform Act funding to offset Medicaid costs.
  • $22.7 million for Supplemental Medical Insurance, including Medicare part B premiums, physician services, outpatient services, medical equipment, supplies and other health service.
  • $202 million for Unemployment Insurance Benefits.
  • $162 million for state employees including troopers, guardsmen, corrections officers, nurses and social service workers who care for our veterans, homeless, and disabled.
  • $15.77 million for the Social Security Contribution Fund.
  • $80 million for capital contracts for transportation agencies funded through ARRA (continues the appropriation authority enacted in the first three emergency spending bills for transportation projects to make payments on the Federal share of liabilities incurred for ARRA capital infrastructure projects) including:
    • $40 million for contracts approved prior to April 1, 2010 where payments must be made during the period from April 1, 2010 to May 2, 2010.
    • $40 million for contracts approved in the period from April 1, 2010 to May 2, 2010 where payments must be made during the same period.
  • $40 million for transportation capital construction projects that are 100% federally funded and do not have any State share of funding. The appropriation applies only to construction contracts approved prior to April 1, 2010 to allow payment of liabilities incurred through May 2, 2010 excluding liabilities funded by ARRA.
  • $10 million for emergency health and safety projects to ensure the safety of citizens across the state isn’t put in jeopardy by needless delays to capital improvements.

As is readily apparent, these are all vital services that New Yorkers rely upon, and represent thousands of jobs that are putting food on the table and a roof over the heads of New York families. Those who support this extender are supporting our troopers, guardsmen, corrections officers, nurses, and social service workers who care for our veterans, the homeless, and mentally disabled.

Which leads me to my next topic. Seventeen Republicans voted against the extender: DeFrancisco, Flanagan, Golden, Hannon, O. Johnson, Larkin, Libous, Marcellino, Maziarz, Nozzolio, Ranzenhofer, Seward, Skelos, Volker, Griffo, Winner and Young. Many of these Republicans have been in office for a decade or more. They had no problem voting for budget extenders when they controlled the chamber.

  • 2008: 9 days late/ 2 extenders
  • 2004: 133 days late/ 12 extenders
  • 2003: 42 days late/ 5 extenders
  • 2002: 42 days late/ 8 extenders
  • 2001: 125 days late/ 12 extenders
  • 2000: 39 days late/ 3 extenders
  • 1999: 126 days late/ 19 extenders
  • 1998: 14 days late/ 4 extenders
  • 1997: 126 days late/ 10 extenders
  • 1996: 104 days late/ 14 extenders
  • 1995: 68 days late/ 10 extenders

Plainly, Republican opposition to the budget extenders isn't about taking a principled stand. It's about showboating for voters and shirking tough decisions. It's playing politics with people's lives and jobs. New Yorkers deserve more.

| Comments ()

Democrats Pass Earth Day Environment 2010 Agenda

By Mike Connery on 04/22/2010 @ 01:01 PM

Tags: Democrats, Environment, Video, Daniel Squadron, SD-25, Antoine Thompson, SD-60, Liz Krueger, SD-26, Brian Foley, SD-3, Andrea Stewart-Cousins, SD-35, SD-2, SD-4, SD-5, SD-6, SD-9, SD-22, SD-24, SD-39, SD-40, SD-41, SD-42, SD-43, SD-44, SD-45, SD-47, SD-50, SD-51, SD-52, SD-53, SD-54, SD-55, SD-56, SD-57, SD-59, SD-60, SD-61

Yesterday, the Senate Democrats passed a package of reforms that will protect our environment and the health of our children. The reforms, sponsored by Senate Dems Daniel Squadron, Antoine Thompson, Liz Kreuger, Andrea Stewart-Cousins, and Brian Foley, included:

  • S3593 / Krueger: Institutes a rechargeable battery producer and retailer sponsored take back program at no costs to consumers.

    Two Republicans voted No on the bill: Betty Little and John Flanagan.
  • S6141B / Squadron: Requires Auto Dealerships to post a Gallons Per Mile Fuel Savings Guide within the dealership that presents information developed by the DEC.

    26 Republicans voted No on the bill: Alesi, Bonacic, DeFrancisco, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Golden, Griffo, Hannon, Owen Johnson, Larkin, Leibell, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Maziarz, McDonald, Nozzolio, Ranzenhofer, Robach, Saland, Seward, Skelos, Volker, Winner, and Young.
  • S6047A / Thompson: Establishes a comprehensive State-wide electronic equipment reuse and recycling program.
  • S4983C / Foley: Limits pesticide exposures for school and daycare aged children by prohibiting certain outdoor, non-essential applications on playgrounds, turf, and athletic or playing fields.

    22 Republicans voted No on the bill: Bonacic, DeFrancisco, Farley, Golden, Griffo, Hannon, Owen Johnson, Lanza, Larkin, Leibell, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Maziarz, Nozzolio, Ranzenhofer, Saland, Seward, Skelos, Volker, Winner, and Young.
  • S3296-G / Thompson: Prohibits the manufacture, distribution and sale of child care products such as pacifiers, bottles and sippy cups that contain Bisphenol.
  • S5119 / Stewart-Cousins: Reduces the State’s waste by prohibiting the purchase and use of non-recyclable paper/mailing products.

    21 Republicans voted No on the bill: Alesi, Bonacic, DeFrancisco, Farley, Flanagan, Golden, Griffo, Owen Johnson, Larkin, Libous, Little, Maziarz, McDonald, Nozzolio, Ranzenhofer, Saland, Seward, Skelos, Volker, Winner and Young.

Watch a video of the Democrats' press conference on the passage of this legislation package:

| Comments ()

Poison Party?

By Mike Connery on 04/21/2010 @ 11:10 AM

Tags: Environment, Schools, John Bonacic, SD-42, John DeFrancisco, SD-50, Hugh Farley, SD-44, Martin Golden, SD-22, Joe Griffo, SD-47, Kemp Hannon, SD-6, Owen Johnson, SD-4, Andrew Lanza, SD-24, William Larkin, SD-39, Vincent Leibell, SD-40, Tom Libous, SD-52, Carl Marcellino, SD-5, George Maziarz, SD-62, Michael Nozzolio, SD-54, Michael Ranzenhofer, SD-61, Steve Saland, SD-41, James Seward, SD-51, Dean Skelos, SD-9, Dale Volker, SD-59, George Winner, SD-53, Catharine Young, SD-57, Betty Little, SD-45

Helping children is usually about as uncontroversial an issue as you can find in politics. Children are our future. Everyone is for children. Unless you're in the New York GOP.

Yesterday, as part of a package of Earth Day related legislation, the State Senate passed a bill sponsored by Brian Foley that prohibits the use of certain toxic chemicals for pesticide and weed control at schools.

Bill Before New York State Lawmakers Would Ban Use of Pesticides on School Playing Fields

Chemical companies are pressing lawmakers to vote against the bill. They say pesticides are highly regulated and safe to use.

Children are especially susceptible to pesticides because of their small size and still-developing organs, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Rather than a purely chemical approach, the agency recommends schools use Integrated Pest Management, which combines several more organic and less toxic techniques to manage pests and weeds, such as overseeding, mowing grass taller, watering less and applying “compost tea,” a liquefied form of compost.

“Put simply, IPM is a safer, and usually less costly option for effective pest management in a school community,” EPA regulators said.

It's not just safer, though. It could also save schools money in the long term:

Schools would see a slight increase in cost during the first two years of IPM, but after the third year, the price would fall about 25 percent below the costs of chemical lawn treatment, according to a study by Grassroots Environmental Education, a nonprofit public health advocacy group in Nassau County. That group has offered free training to school groundskeepers on ways to care for fields without pesticides.

Keeps kids healthy? Check. Fiscally responsible? Check. So why are 22 GOP Senators opposed to this again?

| Comments ()

Would Senate Republicans Prefer a Government Shutdown?

By Mike Connery on 04/20/2010 @ 01:26 PM

Tags: Budget, Republicans, John DeFrancisco, John Flanagan, Martin Golden, Joe Griffo, Kemp Hannon, William Larkin, Ken LaValle, Tom Libous, Carl Marcellino, Michael Nozzolio, Michael Ranzenhofer, James Seward, Dean Skelos, Dale Volker, George Winner, Catharine Young, SD-61, SD-59, SD-54, SD-53, SD-52, SD-51, , SD-47, SD-39, SD-22, SD-9, SD-6, SD-5, SD-2, SD-1, SD-57, SD-55

Yesterday the State Senate voted to pass budget extenders that will fund the essential functions of government and protect vital services on which millions of New Yorkers depend. The budget extenders allow the state to continue paying our troopers, guardsmen, corrections officers, nurses, and social service workers who care for our veterans, the homeless, and mentally disabled. They provide funds for Medicaid, Social Security, and Unemployment.

Without these extenders, the state cannot function, and New Yorkers already struggling to make ends meet with take yet another hard hit. This is a big deal, with an immediate impact on the lives of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of the state's residents. So it's worth noting that 16 Republicans - as they have so often since they lost the majority - said 'No' to a functioning government, 'No' to services for their constituents, and 'No' to paying the first responders we rely upon in emergencies by voting against the budget extenders.

Here is the list of Republicans who voted against yesterday's bill. It's a wall of shame if ever there was one:

  • John DeFrancisco
  • John Flanagan
  • Martin Golden
  • Joe Griffo
  • Kemp Hannon
  • William Larkin
  • Ken LaValle
  • Tom Libous
  • Carl Marcellino
  • Michael Nozzolio
  • Michael Ranzenhofer
  • James Seward
  • Dean Skelos
  • Dale Volker
  • George Winner
  • Catharine Young

Here's my question. With so many New Yorkers struggling, and the state facing one of the biggest fiscal crises in recent memory, does this gang of 16 really think shutting down parts of the government and letting vital services lapse is a good idea? I wonder if their constituents would agree with their answer.

| Comments ()

About | Candidates | Issues | Blog | Newsroom | Get Involved | Contribute | Privacy

newyorksenatedems.com · 111 Washington Ave. Suite 207 · Albany, NY 12210 · P: 518.462.2867 · F: 518.462.1082

Copyright © 2012 New York Senate Dems · All Rights Reserved

Paid for by the New York State Democratic Senate Campaign Committee and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

Powered by ARCOS | Design by Plus Three